Heh! I wonder if the Tax Commission realise that Joe and Jock agree on this particular bit of economic policy. I should have thought that would be enough to settle it!

But why do you think optimal planning use will mean lower ecologically efficient use. I agree if it does it could be solved somewhere else - local plans would need to change in reaction to the effects of the tax anyway as well. But I'm not sure why anyone would say build to a lower density than the optimal use.

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
To combat spam, please enter the code in the image.