Jock's Place blog by Jock Coats is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 2.0 UK: England & Wales License. Based on a work at www.jockcoats.org.uk. Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at http://www.jockcoats.org.uk/copyright.
Atom - articles RSS - articles RSS - comments
Latest Ten Articles
-
Internet Outlaws
17-Nov-08
-
We, the leaders of the Group of Twenty...
15-Nov-08
-
Baby P: where are the others?
15-Nov-08
-
Imagine that: Government in "making matters worse" shock!
13-Nov-08
-
Libertarians: torch bearers for big business?
11-Nov-08
-
Repent! For the end of the state is nigh!
03-Nov-08
-
Paying for Higher Education
29-Oct-08
-
Libertarian Alliance Conference, 2008 (Part II)
28-Oct-08
-
Libertarian Alliance Conference, 2008 (part I)
27-Oct-08
-
If you speed...
27-Oct-08
...and to ones that made be mad!
The Revolutionary Liberalism series
User login
-
Repent! For the end of the state is nigh! -
Discontent on Lib Dem benches? -
Private charity, voluntary co-operation or state welfare -
Evan harries the invincible Cable -
"Lib Dem" donorgate...bring it on -
Faraz Bhatti - I'm not doing my job... -
Karim defection a blow for Nick Clegg? -
Revolutionary Liberalism: 1 - Leadership -
General Erection -
Putting the genie back in the bottle




















comment
Thanks for those Joe. I'll maybe have a read at some point. Though I would say that a. what I am talking about is not actually Social Credit but simple seignorage reform. The former rather extends the latter I'd say but they are not the same thing. It is simply about the right of the state to create the money its economy needs, not actually about whether or not the A+B theory is sound.
In the second article I note in the second paragraph that he does not dispute that bank lending creates new money. Indeed it is A level economic stuff.