Jock's Place blog by Jock Coats is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 2.0 UK: England & Wales License. Based on a work at www.jockcoats.org.uk. Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at http://www.jockcoats.org.uk/copyright.
Atom - articles RSS - articles RSS - comments
Latest Ten Articles
-
Internet Outlaws
17-Nov-08
-
We, the leaders of the Group of Twenty...
15-Nov-08
-
Baby P: where are the others?
15-Nov-08
-
Imagine that: Government in "making matters worse" shock!
13-Nov-08
-
Libertarians: torch bearers for big business?
11-Nov-08
-
Repent! For the end of the state is nigh!
03-Nov-08
-
Paying for Higher Education
29-Oct-08
-
Libertarian Alliance Conference, 2008 (Part II)
28-Oct-08
-
Libertarian Alliance Conference, 2008 (part I)
27-Oct-08
-
If you speed...
27-Oct-08
...and to ones that made be mad!
The Revolutionary Liberalism series
User login
-
Repent! For the end of the state is nigh! -
Discontent on Lib Dem benches? -
Private charity, voluntary co-operation or state welfare -
Evan harries the invincible Cable -
"Lib Dem" donorgate...bring it on -
Faraz Bhatti - I'm not doing my job... -
Karim defection a blow for Nick Clegg? -
Revolutionary Liberalism: 1 - Leadership -
General Erection -
Putting the genie back in the bottle




















Paperwork?
Que es?!
Seriously though, I think it was probably destroyed in one of my floods. I've torn the flat apart (not that that took much doing) and can find canvass cards from my election in 1999 but not for this. Which is odd because I thought I was getting more careful about that sort of thing. But I have had to throw some stuff out.
Nevertheless, CAB is a good idea. I ought to get something out of them before I step down as a director/trustee on Tuesday! I have checked out, however, some of their responses to the recent Consumer Credit Act implementation order where it seems to imply that this sort of front loading of interest and protection premia does go on quite a lot and they quote many examples of how people have been surprised to find that they actually still owe more on settlement than theyborrowed in the first place.
It's one of their big criticisms of the new CCA regime - that the government has stopped short of making it a rule that settlement automatically means the proportion of the capital expressed as a propoertion of the time left on the loan.
It's apparently perfectly legal - and of course if so enforceable by the contract I signed. But absolutely bloody outrageous, especially for a subsidiary of someone supposed to be a respected global banking institution (sic!).
It doesn't cause me financial discomfort. It's just bloody annoying and were I able to reschedule as I was expecting I could be debt free inside 18 months. But it's likely I'll just have to grin and bear this one, and intensify my campaign against the banking system in general as a result!