Jock's Place blog by Jock Coats is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 2.0 UK: England & Wales License. Based on a work at www.jockcoats.org.uk. Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at http://www.jockcoats.org.uk/copyright.
Atom - articles RSS - articles RSS - comments
Latest Ten Articles
-
Helicopter to snoop on speeders
26-Aug-08
-
Blogging will be light to non-existent...
26-Aug-08
-
Labour at odds over football plan
24-Aug-08
-
"Corporatisation" of government functions does not transfer responsibility
24-Aug-08
-
The internet, think-tanks and politicians
24-Aug-08
-
The BR Brute Squad
23-Aug-08
-
Why should the state validate your existence?
22-Aug-08
-
Olympic Spin: Jamaica on top, China in 45th
22-Aug-08
-
How should our details be protected?
22-Aug-08
-
First they took away Habeas Corpus...
22-Aug-08
...and to ones that made be mad!
The Revolutionary Liberalism series
User login
-
Evan harries the invincible Cable -
"Lib Dem" donorgate...bring it on -
Faraz Bhatti - I'm not doing my job... -
Karim defection a blow for Nick Clegg? -
Revolutionary Liberalism: 1 - Leadership -
General Erection -
Putting the genie back in the bottle -
Neo-puritanism: a Liberal opportunity -
At forty I've only ever known Tony Blair too -
Defection Elections; what will Mr Cameron say?




















OK, but that would suggest
OK, but that would suggest quite a range of possible 'fair' return.
So, let's suppose that fashion suddenly turns against hats, and all these hat makers (say sole traders and co-operatives) have to slash their prices or, in desperation take up another trade.
Is the low price a fair one? Even though it causes desperation? Or if not, what would you like to see done about it? Is it fair that the similarly-skilled wig maker is suddenly earning a lot more than the hat maker?
What I'm getting at is that I'm not convinced that 'fair' price or return is a useful concept.