Jock's Place blog by Jock Coats is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 2.0 UK: England & Wales License. Based on a work at www.jockcoats.org.uk. Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at http://www.jockcoats.org.uk/copyright.
Atom - articles RSS - articles RSS - comments
Latest Ten Articles
-
Helicopter to snoop on speeders
26-Aug-08
-
Blogging will be light to non-existent...
26-Aug-08
-
Labour at odds over football plan
24-Aug-08
-
"Corporatisation" of government functions does not transfer responsibility
24-Aug-08
-
The internet, think-tanks and politicians
24-Aug-08
-
The BR Brute Squad
23-Aug-08
-
Why should the state validate your existence?
22-Aug-08
-
Olympic Spin: Jamaica on top, China in 45th
22-Aug-08
-
How should our details be protected?
22-Aug-08
-
First they took away Habeas Corpus...
22-Aug-08
...and to ones that made be mad!
The Revolutionary Liberalism series
User login
-
Evan harries the invincible Cable -
"Lib Dem" donorgate...bring it on -
Faraz Bhatti - I'm not doing my job... -
Karim defection a blow for Nick Clegg? -
Revolutionary Liberalism: 1 - Leadership -
General Erection -
Putting the genie back in the bottle -
Neo-puritanism: a Liberal opportunity -
At forty I've only ever known Tony Blair too -
Defection Elections; what will Mr Cameron say?




















Well, Michaelis's idea is
Well, Michaelis's idea is to use the warmth of the ocean, not the direct sunlight, or as well as direct sunlight. I would more imagine as you suggest Andrew that the dirt poor countries of western Saharan Africa in particular - but anywhere with a decent amount of sun - Australia since it has such a crap record on CO2 and energy production - using their sun and sea water to produce hydrogen, at the same time perhaps as "greening the desert" - at least the populated bits of it. Though I also read an idea yesterday I think that someone said you could could add energy (ie from the sun) to CO2 and water to produce not just hydrogen but proper hydrocarbons - methane mostly but most others could be synthesized from that. I like my hydrogen idea better though as then it doesn't also pollute when burned as a fuel like methane would.
Also another idea I noticed the other week was that those countries with swathes of tropical rain forest could be paid for not cutting it down. They are protecting a precious natural resource we all need - why not pay them to keep it at least as much as it pays them to cut it down if it's so important to planetary function.