<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.jockcoats.org.uk" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Jock&amp;#039;s Place - Labour&amp;#039;s new eugenics - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.jockcoats.org.uk/labours_new_eugenics</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Labour&#039;s new eugenics&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Labour&#039;s new eugenics</title>
 <link>http://www.jockcoats.org.uk/labours_new_eugenics</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
BBC Scotland reports that &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/5162762.stm&quot;&gt;Labour in addicts&#039; children plan&lt;/a&gt;:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Labour MSP Duncan McNeil has proposed that addicts sign a &quot;social contract&quot;, obliging them not to have children until they have beaten their habit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
...which begins to sound like Sweden&#039;s infamous eugenics program of sterilising young women they felt oughtn&#039;t to have children.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Now, whilst we should of course do everything we can to ensure that we don&#039;t inflict on children a home-life from hell, how on earth would withdrawing benefits from women who &quot;slip up&quot; and breach their &quot;contract&quot; and pop out a sprog (and we should always remember that it takes two to make a baby, as I understand it), going to make that resultant child&#039;s life any less hellish?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Further, there is the crass assumption that people with addiction problems are bound to be bad parents which listeners to Professor Jo Neale&#039;s recent &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.brookes.ac.uk/public_lectures/lectures#15&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;public lecture&lt;/a&gt; here at Oxford Brookes University will have learned was an erroneous assumption for the most part.  Whilst I did not agree with some of what Jo had to say - most notably that I am firmly in favour of decrminalising, nay legalising and being able to regulate, illicit drugs - she made a poignant case for treating drug users as fully human, deserving of compassion and respect, and acknowledging that the vast majority of them actually crave no more than a &quot;normal life&quot; beyond the drugs.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Labour&#039;s invasion of our private lives goes on apace.  Pigeon-holing people into convenient categories to make taboos of them.  It is, as the Scottish Drugs Forum has apparently described it, &quot;vicious&quot; and &quot;deeply disquieting&quot;.  We&#039;ll take no lectures on public morals from the likes of Prescott and Blair thank you very much.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.jockcoats.org.uk/labours_new_eugenics#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.jockcoats.org.uk/jocks_categories/labour">Labour</category>
 <category domain="http://www.jockcoats.org.uk/jocks_categories/drugs">drugs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.jockcoats.org.uk/jocks_categories/drugs_laws">drugs laws</category>
 <category domain="http://www.jockcoats.org.uk/jocks_categories/government_interference">government interference</category>
 <category domain="http://www.jockcoats.org.uk/jocks_categories/miscellany">miscellany</category>
 <category domain="http://www.jockcoats.org.uk/jocks_categories/surveillance_state">surveillance state</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 09 Jul 2006 17:59:21 +0100</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Jock</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">209 at http://www.jockcoats.org.uk</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
