<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.jockcoats.org.uk" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Jock&amp;#039;s Place - The political inheritance - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.jockcoats.org.uk/political_inheritance</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;The political inheritance&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>The political inheritance</title>
 <link>http://www.jockcoats.org.uk/political_inheritance</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Apparently genes get names.  I thought they were all numbers or something.  And apparently some of them are now a bit, well, politically incorrect.  I can understand - if you named one the &quot;lunatic fringe gene&quot; when you discovered it made a fruit fly twitch and now you find the same gene in a human and it controls, I dunno, whether one has a propensity to developing diabetes or something it could get a bit confusing discussing the cause of their diabetes in terms like &quot;you have a problem with your lunatic fringe gene&quot;.  So...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/story/0,,1946480,00.html?gusrc=rss&amp;#38;feed=11&quot;&gt;Rebranding exercise for offensive genes&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;The Human Genetics Organisation, which oversees gene naming, is conducting an urgent consultation with scientists to find inoffensive alternative names to genes with titles such as &quot;lunatic fringe&quot; and &quot;one-eyed pinhead&quot;.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I wonder if there&#039;s a &quot;wing-nut&quot; gene?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.jockcoats.org.uk/political_inheritance#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.jockcoats.org.uk/jocks_categories/miscellany">miscellany</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 01:11:13 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Jock</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">49 at http://www.jockcoats.org.uk</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
