<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.jockcoats.org.uk" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Jock&amp;#039;s Place - Do I look bovvered?  The Blogs are the losers! - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.jockcoats.org.uk/do_i_look_bovvered</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Do I look bovvered?  The Blogs are the losers!&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Do I look bovvered?  The Blogs are the losers!</title>
 <link>http://www.jockcoats.org.uk/do_i_look_bovvered</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt; I have to say with a certain smugness that I was out in the pissing rain and blustery icy wind delivering Lib Dem leaflets while our two men in suits were spitting feathers at each other on John Sopel&amp;#39;s lunchtime politics show.  And reading some of the blog comments on it, especially, though understandably I guess as the &amp;quot;victim&amp;quot; of the briefing document with which Sopel ambushed Huhne, in the Cleggosphere, I was prepared to be confronted with a truly undignified public school spat complete with debaggings and wedgies. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; So, having just now watched it, and having already read the document in question as published by the Huhne campaign team, I did think it was a bit of an unedifying spectacle, but really nothing to get so worked up about as to start talking about bringing &amp;quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://lindyloosmuze.blogspot.com/2007/11/has-team-huhne-gone-into-hiding.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;the party into disrepute&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://liberallegend2.blogspot.com/2007/11/huhne-has-gone-too-far.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;consign him to the backbenches&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot; or even, from someone who has one blog entitled &amp;quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://chris4god.blogspot.com/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Chris Almighty&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot; and another called &amp;quot;The Anti-Chris Blog&amp;quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://norfolkblogger.blogspot.com/2007/11/if-chris-huhne-cannot-control-his-own.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;a comment&lt;/a&gt; that electing Chris would see him resign from the party. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;/files/u1/blair_bovvered_0.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Blair - do I look bovvered?&quot; title=&quot;BBC Comic Relief TOny Blair&quot; hspace=&quot;10&quot; vspace=&quot;10&quot; width=&quot;300&quot; height=&quot;169&quot; align=&quot;left&quot; /&gt; Nick is a big boy.  He will have to weather a great deal worse if he is leader.  Chris is, tonight, a very silly looking boy, he will have to learn from this - though I have to say that for me, on reading the document (far more useful than watching the spat on television) many of the &amp;quot;inconsistencies&amp;quot; set out in it do ring true in the various things I seen written about Nick&amp;#39;s position on the relevant issues compared with what he says himself (hence my earlier &lt;a href=&quot;/right_vs_left_protectionism_vs_free_trade_clegg_vs_huhne&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;confusion&lt;/a&gt; in the &lt;a href=&quot;/clegg_vision_and_apology&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;early part of the contest&lt;/a&gt;). &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; The bigger problem for me is that I don&amp;#39;t want someone who rules out &lt;a href=&quot;/paying_education_0&quot;&gt;vouchers&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;/revolutionary_liberalism_3_health_wealth_and_happiness&quot;&gt;insurance&lt;/a&gt;, the &lt;a href=&quot;/revolutionary_liberalism_4_unprecedented_opportunity&quot;&gt;break-up of state monopolies&lt;/a&gt; or any of these things that Chris criticizes Nick for, and the fact that in his attempts to clarify his position Nick also seems to rule them all out means I have nobody squeezing me in my &amp;quot;comfort zone&amp;quot; in this election.  So I am sticking with Chris, because as I have said many times, I believe the future of the party and the country is in adopting an identifiably Liberal political economy and I believe that means having an economist as leader who can instinctively make those arguments when put on the spot. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; Personally, and I realise that with this post I am adding, possibly minutely, to this, I reckon it&amp;#39;s the Lib Dem blogosphere and their shrill partisan screams bordering on vitriol, who are the real losers in this spat and I am sure the men in suits will have made up with each other very soon.  And actually - if they don&amp;#39;t make up, neither of them deserve to lead this party! &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.jockcoats.org.uk/do_i_look_bovvered#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.jockcoats.org.uk/jocks_categories/lib_dem">Lib Dem</category>
 <category domain="http://www.jockcoats.org.uk/jocks_categories/chris_huhne">Chris Huhne</category>
 <category domain="http://www.jockcoats.org.uk/jocks_categories/leadership">leadership</category>
 <category domain="http://www.jockcoats.org.uk/jocks_categories/lib_dem_blogs">Lib Dem Blogs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.jockcoats.org.uk/jocks_categories/nick_clegg">Nick Clegg</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 01:27:52 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Jock</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">707 at http://www.jockcoats.org.uk</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
