<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.jockcoats.org.uk" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Jock&amp;#039;s Place - Lynne Featherstone - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.jockcoats.org.uk/jocks_categories/lynne_featherstone</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Lynne Featherstone&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Oh - okay.  Looks mostly</title>
 <link>http://www.jockcoats.org.uk/dna_did_lynne_really_say#comment-1807</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Oh - okay.  Looks mostly good.  I&amp;#39;d scrap the whole lot personally.  Or at least could only hold DNA while a criminal had unspent convictions.  But maybe even the concept of &amp;quot;unspent&amp;quot; has now gone?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 21:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Jock</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1807 at http://www.jockcoats.org.uk</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>DNA</title>
 <link>http://www.jockcoats.org.uk/dna_did_lynne_really_say#comment-1805</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Jock - Lynne&#039;s views on DNA have featured several times on her website and blog. This article probably is the best summary:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lynnefeatherstone.org/column104-dna-database.htm&quot;&gt;http://www.lynnefeatherstone.org/column104-dna-database.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 19:45:44 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Mark Pack</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1805 at http://www.jockcoats.org.uk</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
