With friends like these...

For a couple of years now the mainstream media and international institutions have been off and on highlighting the plight of white farmers and the 700,000 suburban Harrare citizens evicted from their homes by the nasty dictator Robert Mugabe. Amnesty International even penned a polite letter to President Olusegun Obasanjo of Nigeria as chair of the African Union asking the Union to speak out against these gross breaches of human and civil rights in Zimbabwe. Prince Charles caused an outrage at Pope John Paul's funeral last year when he shook hands, inadvertently it was reported, with this man who has become a pariah in Europe over the past few years (poor Charles - his mind was probably on other looming events where he would be shut out of a church as well).

Last month Gordon Brown and Bill Gates made merry with Obasanjo over the announcement that Gates was giving $600m from his foundation to help fight Tuberculosis in Africa. Nigeria has become Africa's policeman. We have been supporting their efforts in helping to restore order in Liberia, Senegal, Chad and the Darfur area of Sudan most recently.

But in Nigeria, this "friend" of the west has been quietly getting on with evictions on a scale not even imagined by puny Zimbabwe. In the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja, one of those vanity projects like Brasilia more motivated by racial and ethnic power play in the eighties, late last year the capital's authorities began the eviction and demolition of the homes of some 4,000,000 inhabitants. Yes, that's FOUR MILLION, out of a territory population of 7,000,000!

All this ostensibly on the basis that the equivalent of the "Unitary Development Plan" for the Federal Capital Territory when plans were originally laid, envisaged a city of 3,000,000 inhabitants only. Yup, this was merely a planning enforcement issue. And so, it seems, the west and the mainstream media, accept it as a bit of administravia along the lines of your local council ordering next door's too large conservatory to be removed.

FOUR MILLION people, forcibly removed from their homes and communities. And that's only the latest in a long history in Nigeria of heavy handed "enforcement" action against all sorts of rule breakers.

I remember when my father lived there when i was in my teens, in the eighties, we lived a couple of hundred yards down the creek from the "Thousand and four" (I think that was the number anyway) a block of government employees' flats on Victoria Island. In an era of coups and counter-coups, when corrupt ministers like Umaru Dikko were hosting parties in New York to celebrate their first billion dollars, these flats were regularly flushed clean of civil servants who had stopped paying rent, because government had stopped paying them.

And when our housekeeper didn't turn up for work one morning we dicovered that he, along with around a hundred thousand other "illegal" Ghanaian immigrants who did the sorts of jobs that Nigerians didn't want to do (like working for nasty white expatriate households clearly!) were rounded up and marched to the Benin border and deported.

And we continue to fete Obasanjo as some kind of west African hero, a one man UN peace-keeping force, the first remotely democratic leader of Africa's most populous nation for as long as anyone can remember really. With friends like these, who needs enemies like Mugabe? I suppose perhaps it could be said that wealth distribution (and there is HUGE natural wealth in Nigeria) is better in Nigeria - far more ministers and presidents and officials have become millionaires, even billionnaires in Nigeria than in quasi-Marxist Zimbabwe.

If Africa really is to be the focus for the next decades of international development, we've got to get our actions and their countries into some sort of perspective. Four million Nigerians are homeless and landless and we have said nothing.

Trackback URL for this post:

http://www.jockcoats.org.uk/trackback/275

Comments

Abuja was designed as a model city and all buildings have to conform to standard plans. People ignore the law and periodically the Federal Government demolish illegal bulidings. Then there are the shanti road side structures(sort of road side shops)which are not allowed but people try it on until they get bulldozed.

In the outer areas people start building as they feel fit and they have to be bulldozed.

It is a good thing that even up to day they are still maintaining the standard unlike most other cities in Nigeria where one can more of less build any kind of building.

Unfortunately the Media sensationalise the truth of the matter.

I part I agree with you but not about Abuja. It's the migration of the people looking for the fast buck that causes the probs. Have you ever been there?

I certainly agree about the leaders many I know personally especially from the north. My ex had nothing when I met him now his rolling in money and villas. Doesn't even help his family or his village.

I have personally seen horrors that many people here would need therapy. One of my staff was burnt alive in his car during one of the riots.

Was always have to go to the SS to get somebody out of trouble.

Funny how things turn out - wonder we didn't meet. The Brit expat community is very small and because of my work and status which in those days often involved with the official Brit social scene up and down the country. Have travelled the length and breadth of the country often by road. Speak to family and friends most weeks it's not comfortable living.

Some of your comments are bringing back memories.

Whilst I am prepared to accept that the IAI report, and specifically the numbers involved in one hit" of demolition/eviction are an exaggeration, little of this is reported in the MSM. It has mostly been highlighted by Amnesty, the UNHCR and other NGOs.

It fits into a long term pattern in Nigeria. As I think I said, when I was there (over a period of twenty years my family has lived there since 1980) there have been mass evictions all over the country. Even Biafra was caused by evictions (of civil servants) on ethnic and racial grounds from Hausa cities like Kaduna.

What is clear is that when people see their leaders living in what would be opulence even by western standards, they wonder why they can't "be a part of that" and vanity projects like Abuja were bound to attract rural-urban migrants.

Nigeria has vast wealth which ought to be being used better in a country in which 70% of the population are below the accepted dollar a day poverty line and few have any land rights whatever.

That is a failure of planning, not a triumph of planning, and to take out that failure on the least fortunate is a human rights abuse under any definition.

The master plan was devised in the late seventies. When we were in Kenya in the seventies Nairobi was still a relatively small city of not much more than a million inhabitants. As the propensity for urban migration became clear all over Africa the Abuja plan should have been updated to take account of this.

The leadership of a nation cannot cosset itself inside its new city walls and play blind to the plight of those it excludes."

Add comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
To combat spam, please enter the code in the image.