Q: When is a druggie not a druggie?
at 04:44
A: Before the government bans their legal substance of choice...
It was probably too good to be true, a "legal high" giving similar effects to ecstasy. And so it proves to be. The government, following orders from the bansturbators at Euro High Command (who says we still have control of our own domestic laws any longer?) is to move to ban BZP, Benzylpiperazine. According to the Guardian it is likely to become a class C substance by the end of the year:
Move to ban stimulant BZP | Science | The Guardian:
Owen Bowcott
The Guardian, Tuesday March 4 2008 Article history
BZP, a psychoactive stimulant promoted as a legal alternative to ecstasy and amphetamines, is to be banned in Britain. The government's advisory committee on the misuse of drugs will today begin the process of making it a controlled substance, following a recommendation from the European Union. It is likely to become a class C drug before the end of the year. BZP was once almost marketed as an antidepressant until its similarity to amphetamines was noted. It has been associated with vomiting, anxiety, insomnia, mood swings and seizures. It is already a controlled drug in eight EU countries. The EU action is binding and requires all EU member states to take legal action within a year. There has been no direct evidence of BZP causing death, although it has been linked to several fatalities in the UK.
I haven't tried it yet. I was going to a few weeks ago when I felt a bit down and thought it might be safer than trying to get a black market ecstasy tablet or some MDMA - it's really good for social situations that make me nervous and where I would not want to get drunk just to be able to strike up a conversation with strangers.
The whole sorry saga highlights just how idiotic the drugs laws are, and in particular the British classification system that Jacqui Smith has recently re-inforced with her deadly new death strategy. If BZP becomes a class C drug, while those it seeks to emulate are class B, amphetamines, and class A the even less harmful MDMA/ecstasy, where is the science behind that? Yup, you're right, there isn't any.
They may as well make sugar and chocolate class Bs on a whim if you ask me. Both are "linked" to several thousand fatalities each year in the UK. There's better science there it seems to me to justify that. But more than this, no doubt the search will go on for another substance, as yet uncontrolled, that will give similar effects, and the drugs laws will play catch up once again after legal businesses have built up a good trade in unadulterated doses because they can operate in country in clean, clinical lab factories and not kitchen top clandestine chemistry sets.
Trackback URL for this post:
Comments
Yup. Totally agreed. The key words are legalisation, regulation, taxation and education*. How do you square this with the Lib Dems being at the forefront of the bansturbators?
Thanks a lot for your support on my 'Twats of the day' post, BTW! It is a bit bizarre that my (proto-UKIP) economic policies are closer to yours than to the so called Libertarians. Hmmm...
* Neil Harding added this to the list.
Add comment































"They may as well make sugar
"They may as well make sugar and chocolate class Bs on a whim if you ask me"
Shhhhhhhhhhhhhh!
I reckon they'll have another go at khat next:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khat
Really must nip over to Wood Green and get some. I was foolish enough not to stock up on Wispas when they had their recent limited re-release, and I've learnt my lesson.