Jock's Place | ...ramblings of a Geo-Mutualist Liberal Democrat

View
links

Quelle Surprise: if you're a rich influential crackhead...

29.07.08
at 17:40

tagged with:

I don't suppose they were referred to the local DAAT (Drug and Alcohol Action Team), or SMART (Substance Misuse Arrest Referral Team), nor will the "formal warning" likely include a Drugs Testing and Treatment Order (DTTO). They're unlikely to have a probation officer who needs to send their details to the Employment Service to get their benefits stopped, but what the hell - they've got off basically...

Drugs charges against Tetra Pak heir and wife are dropped

Drugs charges against Tetra Pak heir and wife are dropped Elizabeth
Stewart and agencies guardian.co.uk, Tuesday July 29 2008 Article
history Drugs charges against the heir to the multi-billion dollar
Tetra Pak fortune and his wife have been dropped, it was announced
today. Prosecutor Martha Godwin told a hearing at City of Westminster
magistrates court that the charges would be dropped as part of an
arrangement that will see the couple given a formal police warning

...one rule for the few, and one for the many. Britain's drugs laws...useless, counterproductive and deadly...but usually only if you are poor.

Appreciated this post? Support my blogging with coffee!

Trackback URL for this post:

http://www.jockcoats.org.uk/trackback/917

comments RSS

Comments

Good for them

On 29.07.08 at 22:36 Mark Wadsworth (not verified) said:

What's the class war angle to this? Sure, drugs should be legalised for all, but the fact that they were let off is cause for cheer rather than otherwise.

It's the double standards

On 29.07.08 at 23:34 Jock said:

It's the double standards that gets me. It's the very people, at the bottom of the shit heap, who would benefit most, themselves individually and their communities, from legalization who bear the heaviest burden of enforcement. But yes, good for them. The point remains though, you are more likely it seems to be treated this way at the other end of the pay scale by the very people who would probably hang and flog the lesser mortals for the same thing.

It's worse than the double standards...

On 30.07.08 at 11:33 Neale (not verified) said:

Hi Jock & Mark,

I think it's worse than just double standards. Take the music industry, for example. Organised crime doesn't get to put up billboard posters saying "How difficult can it be to clean a hospital" [... err... no.. just got that billboard flashback] ... I mean "Snort cocaine and you'll be a party animal".

Instead, they get all their marketing done for free, thanks to the music industry, and the collusion of the press.

If we're going to continue with the legal status of most drugs, then we should at least put in a law that is equal to all, but proportional to the message given out: if you're convicted for possession, then you get banned from appearing in the media for a year.

I somehow think that the music industry would make far more of an effort to look after their assets if this were the rule!