Randomly Selected Article or Link
at 13:41
Another one that's been around on my newsreader for some months now - Lib Dem Jo Anglezarke.
Trackback URL for this post:
at 00:03
In her defense of the surveillance state (sorry if I've misunderstood but that's what it sounds like!) at CCTV conspiracy mania is a very middle-class disorder there's one little sentence that gives it all away. She says:
There is a sad lack of voices to praise the benign state these days.
Maybe that's because there is no such thing as "the benign state", now or at any point in history that immediately comes to mind.
Trackback URL for this post:
at 16:37
...I am an "irrelevant bystander", as are approximately 59,800,000 other members of the public, and I simply do not believe you are going to do anything in the next twelve months to change that, much as I would want you to, so that we never have a party place-person appointed to your executive office by a dwindling group of political hacks and activists ever again.
So if that was all that is holding you back, I give you leave to go now.
By the way - thanks for sorting out the blockade of Lebanon, today. That was you was it? I would never have known.
Interesting: Tony seems to be lying even about that.
Trackback URL for this post:
at 12:30
No doubt most readers will be unaware of the fact that nicotine is quite a nice drug to use when indulging in certain other illegal drugs. That's why you see people off their tits in clubs on E or coke smoking away even when you know they're not really smokers. The stimulant, nicotine, tops up the effects of these other drugs, sustaining or boosting the high.
It will be interesting to see if people take to sucking on a nicotine replacement lozenge or chewing gum instead. Maybe such oral delivery mechanisms for your chosen poison will become even more acceptable. Perhaps even make people think differently about "popping a pill" of something else.
Trackback URL for this post:
at 13:20
From BBC Wiltshire (dear knows why I subscribe to a news feed predominantly about Swindon of all places!):
A man at the centre of a police investigation into an explosion in Swindon has been de-arrested.
The 44-year-old remains in hospital with burns injuries after the roof blew off a block of flats on 23 December in the Toothill area of the town.
Wiltshire Police said no formal interviews had taken place and because he had not visited a police station all records of his arrest would be removed.
Now I wonder if his DNA was taken and whether it will now be destroyed. Is "de-arrested" a real legal concept anyway?
Trackback URL for this post:






























