Randomly Selected Article or Link

Of course it's no big secret that I am a complete legalizer as far as drugs go. But it is good to see the police chief constables taking such an idea seriously. We know that a high proportion of property crime and crime against person are perpetrated by drug users funding the criminal underworld market to get their next fix. These crimes cost a huge amount both financially and emotionally on the rest of society, and an even bigger amount to incarcerate people who have perpetrated them, and they are still not getting the treatment while inside to prevent the revolving door.

Complete legalization would still, in my opinion, be preferable by far - as only then would people who are addicted be most amenable to getting treatment when it is not also a criminal thing, but this would be a big step and deserves support. Incidentally the poll on the BBC website covering the story is currently running at 52% in favour of the idea, which is way more than I would have expected - though maybe the Daily Mail hasn't told its readers to go vote against yet.

Give addicts heroin, says officer:

Howard Roberts said prescribing heroin to criminals would cut crime

Heroin should be prescribed to drug addicts to curb crime, the deputy chief constable of Nottinghamshire has said at a drugs conference.

UPDATE: Just saw Professor Griffth Edwards on C4 News laying into this idea. And he's not the first I've seen today - one of the charitable bodies working on drugs misuse said a similar thing - that you're just going to stoke up the problem. that the addict will have the system over a barrel - give me more or I'll go back to crime. Dr Edwards says that the only way is to get people off these hard drugs. I agree.

But I say the way to do that is to make it possible and socially acceptable to acknowledge a problem and get treatment for it. And the only way of doing that is in an open and accepting enviroment. And while they do come to realise they have a problem and seek help, they will also be able to get cheap, well regulated and much safer drugs so they're less likely to die before they get help.

The 27.6% of you trying to access this site with Internet Explorer 7 (at least - I'm not sure about the other 35.2% using IE6) may have been experiencing problems access my site recently. It appears that when I added a module to make the list of blogs down the left hand side collapsable so as not to take up so much space IE7 didn't like some of its Javascript.

Only one of you contacted me to say there was a problem but since I could reproduce the error 100% of the time when I did look at the site using Internet Exploder 7 on M$ Windoze I presume you will all have been suffering in silence, or at the very least, indifference.

So I've disabled the collapsable side bars for the moment at least and will check whether there's an update to the relevant modules to cope with IE's failings.

However, since most of you come this way from Lib Dem sites, I recommend you upgrade to a more co-operatively developed browser, such as Firefox, which would be more fitting for supporters the party of anti-monopoly and free trade.

I don't quite know how I have managed to go through the last nearly forty years without seeing "Cathy Come Home" until tonight.

Especially with my interest in housing provision.

Have things improved? We've certainly demolished most of the women's hostels shown in the film. But what about absolute numbers in inadequate housing? The film quoted, I think, a million households in 1966. Government figures currently show just under a hundred thousand household accepted and in temporary accommodation.

But take Oxford. They are shown as supporting 742 households in temporary accommodation. But four thousand and more are on the housing register. So let's say there are nearly 600,000 households in inadequate accommodation. Then there's the estimate from Crisis a year or so ago, of the "hidden homeless" - those not on registers, "sofa surfing". They estimated another nearly 400,000 individuals.

As the last lines of the film said - "homelessness was seen as a temporary problem after the war, but the problem appears to be with us for the foreseeable future". Forty years on, it appears still to be a timely prophesy.