Randomly Selected Article or Link
at 17:42
Now, I don't subscribe to everything that appears on IndyMedia but it's often useful for local alerts about things going on around Oxford as they have an Oxford based group and server. So I was interested to see:
UK Indymedia - Cargo Plane with Hebrew markings at RAF Brize Norton:
Are our government, apparently wanting but not wanting a ceasefire, now routing weapons to Israel from the US or elsewhere via RAF bases?
I think we should be told.
Trackback URL for this post:
at 21:33
de moribus liberalibus
Trackback URL for this post:
at 22:04
Mail online - Peter Hitchens
Trackback URL for this post:
at 18:37
Police probe MP quad bike footage
The picture from Hunt Monitors shows Mr Soames with the childrenPolice are investigating a film allegedly showing a Conservative MP riding a quad bike on a public road.
A child is seen perched behind Nicholas Soames, MP for Mid Sussex. Two more children and other adults are in a trailer being towed by the quad bike.
Hunt saboteurs claim the footage was shot on New Year's Day in Slaugham, West Sussex, as Mr Soames followed the Crawley and Horsham Hunt.
Of course these folk areas entitled as anyone else to go along, watch the procedings and presumably their aim is to try to ensure that the recent laws on hunting are being complied with. But it strikes me that this sort of telling tales, whoever the alleged driver, is all about spite and class warfare. Do they sit by the side of the road in their no doubt urban havens of natural bliss photographing and reporting every road traffic misdemeanour? I'll bet not.
Such are the people with whom many Lib Dem MPs hitched their wagon in the hunting debates. They should have been more circumspect and understood that the anti-hunting campaign was a political, class based campaign against "toffs" like Soames, the "unspeakable".
Trackback URL for this post:
at 09:17
Now I'm not normally one for the line that for every nuisance we need a new law, but with fireworks I'm perilously close to calling for a complete ban.
I cannot imagine any circumstances in which letting off an explosive charge, however much fun it might be for those doing it or watching the spectacle, does not harm another. I suppose if, like the Barclay brothers, you own a private island out o sight and sound from any other inhabitants then maybe.
But for the rest of us, pets and children get scared - I know several dogs that turn frankly neurotic if they hear just one from miles away, and if they are out on a walk they scarper and risk being knocked down if you can't catch them before they reach the road. Tonight I've lost four hours' sleep because some bastard let one off near my window and I woke up like I was living in Baghdad or somewhere to find that several more were being let off, including one that set fire to a waste bin into which it had been thrown. Presumably the perptrator had no real idea as to whether it would simply start a fire or blow the bloody doors off and maim someone with them.
Despite what I thought were some tightening up of the regulations about when it was permissible, or anti-social, to let them off, this past week has seen several in Oxford at one, two, three and even as today four in the morning. And they are next to impossible to police - it only takes one to wake everyone up for miles around and the chances of pinpointing where it came from unless you are very quick and very local are zilch.
Maybe it is time only to allow licensed displays to even purchase any but the most innocuous "flash and fizz" type ones. Why does anyone think it is their right to hurl explosives that make loud noises into the air over our heads at any time of the day or night?
Trackback URL for this post:






























