<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.jockcoats.org.uk" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>technorati</title>
 <link>http://www.jockcoats.org.uk/taxonomy/term/53/feed</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Shareware - the future of Intellectual Property?</title>
 <link>http://www.jockcoats.org.uk/shareware_future_intellectual_property</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
Way back last year sometime James Graham  wrote an insightful piece about &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2007/12/26/intellectual-property-the-big-21st-century-faultline/&quot;&gt;Intellectual Property - the big 21st century faultline?&lt;/a&gt;.  As readers will know, as a mutualist, like other libertarian and anarchist descendants (part of the debate amongst whom James &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.libertarian.co.uk/lapubs/libhe/libhe014.htm&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;highlights&lt;/a&gt;), I regard patents and copyrights as one of the four great monopolies that have to be crushed before we get a truly free world and a genuine advance in the conditions of labour.  It&amp;#39;s not one that I major on because I don&amp;#39;t understand it enough yet to make decent arguments - particularly it has to be said against those who tell me that pharmaceutical life saving advances would be jeopardized by any change to this protectionist mechanism.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
But as well as obviously following the debate about &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.defectivebydesign.org/join/button&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;digital rights/restrictions&lt;/a&gt; the subject recently came up at a university board meeting where we were discussing the outrageous economic rent stolen by publishing houses from academics in return for organizing a peer review system that things like Technorati rather prove unnecessary to my mind.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Anyway, I just thought James, if he hasn&amp;#39;t seen it already, might like to see this analysis at the &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.mises.org/archives/007599.asp&quot;&gt;Ludvig von Mises Institute blog&lt;/a&gt; of the Radiohead album giveaway &amp;quot;stunt&amp;quot; and how it might change the playing field as the CD version of the album goes on sale in the US today: &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jockcoats.org.uk/shareware_future_intellectual_property&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;read&amp;nbsp;more&amp;nbsp;&amp;raquo;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.jockcoats.org.uk/shareware_future_intellectual_property#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.jockcoats.org.uk/jocks_categories/economic_liberalism">economic liberalism</category>
 <category domain="http://www.jockcoats.org.uk/jocks_categories/property_rights">property rights</category>
 <category domain="http://www.jockcoats.org.uk/jocks_categories/protectionism">protectionism</category>
 <category domain="http://www.jockcoats.org.uk/jocks_categories/technorati">technorati</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 13:43:05 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Jock</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">749 at http://www.jockcoats.org.uk</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
