Vince Cable: some regrets but no splits

One last post on this, not because I care, but because I report "news" in this instance...

It was to be expected I suppose that the events of the past few days would be mentioned in Vince Cable's talk at the Oxford East constituency dinner this evening, and he didn't disappoint.

So for all of those out that are talking of splits in the party and and bad feeling, his message was quite clear.

There are no splits. We are (except perhaps for me) the most united party on the whole issue of Europe. There were differences of opinion over tactics; whether abstaining was going back on a manifesto promise, or rather whether abstaining specifically on the treaty rather than the constitution was going back on such a promise. Some people took that position. Those who resigned the front bench before voting did so with good grace and no rancour towards Nick or anyone else.

He did seem to me to suggest, but I'm sure not say explicitly, that the regrets are over the events of the last couple of weeks as a whole. The profile that by implication Nick has given to this one issue. For me of course, I think that's just the new boy not quite realizing in time he was being set up by the Tory Euro-shambles to take the fall for their own irresponsibility on the issue. And perhaps a regret that Nick was backed into a position in which he felt it was right to make it a three line whip issue.

Cameron has not faced such a media backlash for his massive rebellion because although it was a front bench position to abstain from Bill Cash's amendment, he had not insisted on whipping it - but the rebellion was larger than ours and shows up the Tory incoherence on Europe.

The parliamentary party are only too aware that they have caused headlines for the wrong reasons and are apologetic for that. But todays newspapers...

Trackback URL for this post:

http://www.jockcoats.org.uk/trackback/826

Comments

"the rebellion was larger than ours "

40 out of 198 Conservatives = 20% on a whip just for the shadow cab.
15 of 63 Lib Dems = 24% on a 3 line whip.

Do you still stick by that quote?

I'm not sure that I'm quoting anything - merely reporting the gist of what was said. Given that the Tories split on what was presumably an unwelcome amendment from one of their own, I'd certainly say "more significant". I'd suggest that (as was the vague consensus on This Week last night) unlike our little tactical rebellion the Tory one is more likely to indicate a strategic split in the party on policy. I think it's harder to wriggle out of the charge that the Tories are unable to produce a consensus on Europe than it is for the Lib Dems, and more importantly that that has greater potential to last long after the Lib Dems are back seen as fundamentally as one on the whole issue.

Add comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
To combat spam, please enter the code in the image.